Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, information-dense project design-system reference with mostly executable snippets and no conceptual padding. Its main weaknesses are the absence of any progressive disclosure (everything inlined in one file), a missing mapping from custom color tokens to usable NativeWind classes, and a version-pinned dependency table that will age.
Suggestions
Add a short example showing how the custom color tokens from src/constants/colors.ts translate into actual NativeWind/Tailwind class names, since the 'No Arbitrary Hex Colors' rule forbids the obvious bg-[#059669] workaround.
Move the full component inventory and app-structure tree into a references/ file (e.g. references/components.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links.
Place version-pinned dependency info in a dedicated section (or note how to verify current versions) so stale version numbers don't mislead future sessions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with project-specific data (hex tokens, file paths, component props) and assumes Claude's competence, explaining no general concepts. Penalized one notch for the pinned version table ('NativeWind v4.2.2', 'Tailwind CSS v3.4.19', 'Reanimated v4.2.1', 'Expo Router v55') — time-sensitive version numbers not placed in an old-patterns/deprecated section. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: concrete snippets like "<Animated.View entering={FadeInUp.delay(100).duration(400)}>", the withObservables HOC example, exact hex values, and file paths. One notable gap: it defines custom tokens ('primary', 'statusActive') but never shows how they map to NativeWind class names, while simultaneously requiring 'You MUST use standard Tailwind classes (e.g. bg-blue-900)'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a reference/lookup skill with well-organized sections and an unambiguous single consult pattern; no multi-step process or destructive/batch operation exists that would require validation checkpoints. It sits above anchor 3 because lookup flows are clear, but below 5 because at ~190 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception and gives no sequencing guidance (e.g., how to combine palette, components, and animation choices when building a screen). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are clearly headed and navigable, but the entire ~190-line body — full component inventory (20 components), app-structure tree, and complete color palette — is inlined in SKILL.md with no bundle files or references. This matches anchor 3 ('content that should be separate is inline') better than anchor 4, since substantial reference material could live in separate files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |