CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

cv-tailor

Optimize resumes by matching keywords to the job description, rewriting experience with the quantified STAR method, and checking ATS compatibility. Triggered when users ask for resume help, review, or polishing, mention JD matching, STAR method, ATS, or want to tailor their resume for a specific role.

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a highly actionable, clearly sequenced SOP with strong validation checkpoints, but it is monolithic and includes some concept explanations Claude already knows. Splitting reference material into bundle files and trimming redundant background would lift the two weaker dimensions.

Suggestions

Trim or remove concept explanations Claude already knows — e.g. the 'ATS Basics' paragraph and the STAR Method Definition table — leaving only the operational thresholds, templates, and checklists to improve conciseness.

Move the large detailed tables (Phase 4 ATS format/structure tables, the Phase 2 keyword matrix, the Phase 5 scorecard templates) into reference files under ./references/ and link to them from SKILL.md so the main file becomes an overview with one-level-deep navigation.

Keep the SOP phase skeleton, interaction modes, and quality checklists in SKILL.md as the lean entry point, pushing the per-phase worked examples and guiding-question banks into those reference files.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Most of the body is operationally specific, but it spends tokens explaining concepts Claude already knows — e.g. 'ATS is the software companies use to automatically screen resumes…' and the STAR Method Definition table — so it is mostly efficient but could be tightened, not the lean level-3 case.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable guidance throughout — concrete thresholds ('Required keyword coverage ≥ 80%'), a keyword match-matrix template, an ATS scorecard format, quantification guiding questions, and per-entry checklists — which for an instruction-only skill is fully actionable with no penalty for absent code.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Five phases are clearly sequenced with explicit per-entry and final Quality Checklists acting as validation checkpoints, before/after comparisons, and an Iterative Refinement feedback loop (re-execute from the relevant phase and cascade), matching the level-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Internally well-structured by phase, but it is a monolithic ~280-line SKILL.md with no bundle files and no external references; detailed tables and templates that could live in separate reference files are kept inline, so it is not the cleanly-split level-3 case. The under-50-line simple-skill exemption does not apply here.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, third-person, and clearly answers both what the skill does and when to trigger it, with natural user-facing trigger terms. It is a strong, concise description with no over-claims or fluff.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions — 'matching keywords to the job description', 'rewriting experience with the quantified STAR method', and 'checking ATS compatibility' — matching the top anchor rather than the vague 'names domain and some actions' level 2.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (the three optimization actions) and 'when' via the explicit 'Triggered when users ask for…' clause, satisfying the top anchor and avoiding the level-2 cap for a missing trigger clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural terms users would actually say — 'resume help', 'review', 'polishing', 'JD matching', 'STAR method', 'ATS', and 'tailor their resume for a specific role' — broad coverage rather than the partial level 2 set.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The resume/JD-tailoring niche is clearly bounded and the triggers (STAR method, ATS, JD matching) are distinct enough to be unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
zebbern/claude-code-guide
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.