Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable content: executable commands, complete JSON schemas for all four infographic types, and an accurate single-script bundle. Weaknesses are minor — marketing-style Design Highlights/Use Cases sections and no error-recovery guidance after the documented error output.
Suggestions
Trim the 'Design Highlights' and 'Use Cases' sections to a single line each (or drop them) — they describe benefits rather than instruct, and their facts (self-contained output, zero dependencies) already appear elsewhere.
Add one line after the error-output example, e.g. 'On error, fix the listed fields in config.json and re-run', to close the validate -> fix -> retry loop.
Consider adding natural synonyms such as 'graphs' or 'plots' to the frontmatter description's trigger clause to broaden natural-language matching.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — a config field table, complete JSON examples per type, and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows — but "Design Highlights" ("Zero external dependencies", "Professional palettes") and "Use Cases" are promotional padding that could be trimmed, matching the anchor for minor over-explanation rather than the every-token-earns-its-place score-5 case. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | "python3 scripts/build_infographic.py config.json" and the stdin variant are copy-paste ready, and complete executable JSON examples cover all four types (stats, comparison, flow, dashboard) plus the full field table, palette values, icon list, and success/error output formats — matching the fully-executable, common-cases-covered score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-action skill (build a config, run the script) the usage is unambiguous and even the error output shape is documented, but there is no instruction on what to do when status is "error" (no validate -> fix -> retry loop), so it sits at clear-sequence-with-minor-validation-gaps rather than score 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are clearly organized and the single bundle file referenced (scripts/build_infographic.py) exists, is one level deep, and matches the documented palettes and config fields; the inline per-type format examples are the core instructions for a single-script skill and belong in SKILL.md, so structure is appropriately split with no nesting. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |