CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

red-team-tools

This skill should be used when the user asks to "follow red team methodology", "perform bug bounty hunting", "automate reconnaissance", "hunt for XSS vulnerabilities", "enumerate subdomains", or needs security researcher techniques and tool configurations from top bug bounty hunters.

68

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, well-sequenced recon and bug-bounty methodology, but it is verbose with redundant tool listings, lacks validation checkpoints for batch operations, and keeps all reference material inline rather than splitting it across files.

Suggestions

Tighten conciseness by consolidating redundant alternative tools per task (e.g., pick one primary subdomain/live-host tool and list alternatives in a single line) and removing section-intro filler.

Add explicit validation/verification checkpoints between batch steps (e.g., confirm hosts resolved before scanning, verify findings before reporting) to lift workflow clarity.

Move large reference blocks (the recon.sh script, tool table, API endpoint list, and XSS payloads) into separate reference files under references/ and link to them from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly executable commands, but it is long and includes redundant alternative-tool listings per task plus section-intro filler ("Identify technologies for targeted attacks", "Find hidden endpoints and files"). It is not 3 because the length and repetition could be tightened, and not 1 because it largely avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides many concrete, copy-paste-ready bash commands plus a complete executable recon.sh script and specific examples. It is not the level below because the guidance is executable rather than pseudocode or abstract direction.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps are clearly sequenced (numbered sections 1–10 from acquisitions through automated recon), but there are no validation or verify-then-proceed checkpoints for batch scanning operations. Per the rubric, missing feedback loops for batch operations caps this at 2 rather than 3.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into sections but entirely monolithic: large reference material (the recon script, tool table, API endpoint list, XSS payloads) lives inline in SKILL.md with no external file split. It is not 3 because content that should be separate is inline, and not 1 because organization is reasonable rather than poor.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that combines explicit, naturally phrased triggers with concrete capability actions in a clear niche. It uses third-person voice and avoids vague fluff.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions such as "enumerate subdomains", "hunt for XSS vulnerabilities", "automate reconnaissance", and "perform bug bounty hunting" rather than vague language. It is not the level below because it goes well beyond naming a domain and a few actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly states when to use it ("This skill should be used when the user asks to...") and conveys what it does (security researcher techniques, tool configurations, and the enumerated actions). It is not the level below because the 'when' is explicit trigger guidance rather than merely implied.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Quotes natural phrases a user would actually say ("follow red team methodology", "perform bug bounty hunting", "hunt for XSS vulnerabilities", "enumerate subdomains"). It is not the level below because it covers several common natural variations rather than a single keyword.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche (red team methodology, bug bounty hunting, subdomain enumeration) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills. It is not the level below because the triggers are specific enough to avoid overlap with general security or coding skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
zebbern/claude-code-guide
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.