Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured: concise checklist-style guidance, a clearly sequenced three-phase workflow with validation checkpoints, concrete tool and target references, and a single well-signaled one-level-deep reference file. It respects Claude's competence while remaining highly actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean, checklist-driven overview (□ items, tables, routing) that assumes Claude's competence and does not explain known concepts; the only mild overhead is the ceremonial "ACTION REQUIRED" preamble, which stays actionable rather than padded. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific instruction-style guidance — exact manifest fields (permissions, host_permissions, background, content_scripts), exact DevTools surfaces (chrome://extensions, attach service worker), and named tools (jq, YARA, Frida/CDP) — which the rubric's scoring notes explicitly bless for instruction-only skills. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced three-phase workflow (包体 → 逻辑 → 动态) with an explicit error-check step (chrome://extensions 检查错误) and a final "任务完成自检" checklist serving as a validation checkpoint, matching the clear-sequence-with-checklist anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a concise overview with one real bundle file (references/extension-analysis.md) referenced one level deep under a clearly signaled "参考" section; the reference exists and appropriately supplements the overview. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |