CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

competition-queue-worker-drift

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for queues, async workers, cron jobs, delayed tasks, retry behavior, worker-only config drift, and payload-to-side-effect chains. Use when the user asks to trace a queue payload, inspect async job execution, explain worker-only behavior, follow retries or dead-letter handling, or connect an enqueued item to a later file, cache, email, or privilege-bearing side effect. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a lean, actionable tracing methodology with a clear multi-stage workflow and a single well-signaled reference file that exists and complements it. It assumes Claude's competence and avoids concept restatement.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and directive — it lists what to record and compare without explaining concepts Claude already knows (no 'what is a queue' padding), and every section earns its place; it is not the verbose concept-explaining anchor.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete, specific checklists rather than vague direction — 'Record queue names, topics, cron schedules, delayed jobs, dead-letter queues, worker processes, and consumer groups' and 'Record retry count, backoff, dedupe keys, failure handling, dead-letter flow, and idempotency behavior' — which is actionable guidance for an instruction-only skill.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequenced process — Quick Start steps plus three numbered Workflow stages (Map → Trace → Reduce) — with a proof checkpoint ('Reproduce the smallest enqueue-to-side-effect flow that proves the decisive async drift'); this is an analysis skill so destructive/batch validation caps do not apply.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The body is an overview that signals exactly one one-level-deep reference — 'Load references/queue-worker-drift.md for the queue checklist, retry checklist, and evidence packaging' — and that file exists and is well-organized, matching the clear-overview-with-well-signaled-references anchor.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, trigger-rich, complete, and tightly scoped to a distinct downstream niche, using third-person voice throughout. It reads as a strong, low-conflict skill description.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete capabilities — 'queues, async workers, cron jobs, delayed tasks, retry behavior, worker-only config drift, and payload-to-side-effect chains' plus specific actions like 'trace a queue payload' and 'follow retries or dead-letter handling', matching the multi-action anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (CTF-sandbox workflow for queues/workers/retries) and 'when' via an explicit 'Use when the user asks to trace...' clause, with an additional routing precondition; not missing either half.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrasings a user debugging would actually say — 'trace a queue payload', 'inspect async job execution', 'explain worker-only behavior', 'follow retries or dead-letter handling' — giving good coverage of trigger terms rather than jargon.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (async worker drift in a CTF sandbox) and is explicitly scoped 'Use only after $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here', making conflict with sibling skills unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.