Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is compact and well-structured with concrete routing and a self-check, but the central workflow leans on checklist-style steps and placeholders rather than copy-paste-ready commands, and the batch path lacks an explicit validation checkpoint.
Suggestions
Replace checkbox-style workflow steps (e.g. "□ 从字符串 / 导入 API 反查") with concrete, runnable Ghidra/analyzeHeadless commands or exact menu paths so guidance is copy-paste ready.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the headless batch flow (e.g. verify the decompile export is non-empty and re-run on failure) to lift workflow_clarity above the batch cap of 3.
Tighten redundancy between the ACTION REQUIRED block and the 工作流 section, or clearly label ACTION REQUIRED as routing-only so the two don't restate the same steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, checkbox- and table-driven body that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining what Ghidra is; minor redundancy between the ACTION REQUIRED block and the 工作流 section could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides one concrete executable command (analyzeHeadless) plus referenced keystrokes, but the core workflow steps are checkbox/pseudocode-like with placeholder paths and the MCP section lacks a concrete command. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence exists (NOW/NEXT/ACT plus 工作流 1–4) with a final self-check, but the batch headless flow has no explicit validate-then-proceed checkpoint, so the batch-operation cap of 3 applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with a real one-level reference (references/ghidra-cheatsheet.md, confirmed present) and clearly signaled sibling-skill pointers; some ../ paths are routing context rather than bundle files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |