Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-structured instruction-only skill: lean token usage, a sequenced workflow with explicit legal/shielded-room validation gates, and a properly signaled one-level reference. The main weakness is actionability — the analysis steps name tools but stay too high-level to be directly executable.
Suggestions
Add a brief concrete procedure for the analysis steps, e.g. how to identify the center frequency/modulation in URH or GNU Radio, so the "分析" stage is actionable rather than just naming the tool.
Expand the self-check into explicit pass/fail criteria (e.g. what counts as having "记录法规边界") so the validation checkpoint is unambiguous.
Note that the workflow and 任务完成自检 overlap slightly; merging the redundant items would tighten the body further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and terse — a short checklist, compact tool table, and brief sections with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names concrete tools (RTL-SDR, HackRF, URH, GNU Radio, Inspectrum) and a clear sequence, but the analysis steps themselves ("GNU Radio / URH 分析", "识别中心频率与调制") stay high-level without specific procedures, fitting the incomplete-guidance anchor rather than fully actionable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is a clearly sequenced checklist with explicit validation gates ("法规与许可确认" first, "重放仅屏蔽室且书面允许") plus a completion self-check, matching the clear-sequence-with-checkpoints anchor for a risky RF domain. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview that signals one real one-level-deep reference (references/sdr-lab-rules.md, verified present) and sibling skills, fitting the clear-overview-with-well-signaled-references anchor for a sub-50-line skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |