CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

wifi-wireless

Use for authorized wireless security assessment including Wi-Fi capture, WPA handshake analysis, rogue AP detection research, and lab-only deauth testing.

64

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/wifi-wireless/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A concise, well-structured wireless assessment skill with a clear sequenced workflow and real validation/self-check steps. Its main weakness is actionability: the toolchain is named but not given as copy-paste executable commands with the flags needed to run them.

Suggestions

Add executable command examples with key flags (e.g. `airodump-ng -c <ch> --bssid <BSSID> wlan0mon`, `hcxdumptool -i wlan0mon -o capture.pcapng`) so the workflow is copy-paste ready rather than tool-plus-purpose.

Include an explicit feedback loop for the common failure case — e.g. if no handshake is captured, confirm monitor mode is active and target is locked before retrying, rather than relying on a post-hoc self-check.

Signal the cross-skill references more explicitly (name the specific section in ../pentest-tools/ and ../attack-chain/ instead of bare directory paths) to strengthen navigation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean checklists, a compact tool table, and minimal preamble that mostly assumes Claude's competence; minor bilingual ceremony such as 'ACTION REQUIRED(读完后立刻执行)' could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete tools are named (airodump-ng, hcxdumptool, hashcat, Wireshark) and the sequence is clear, but the workflow entries are tool-plus-purpose rather than executable commands with flags and arguments, leaving key execution details missing.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced checklist (monitor → lock BSSID → capture → offline eval → report) with a task-completion self-check and upfront scope/authorization validation; the only gap is a missing error-recovery feedback loop for failed handshake capture.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized sections with a one-level-deep reference (references/wireless-lab-rules.md, which exists) and content appropriately split out; held at 4 because only one bundled reference is present and the cross-skill '../pentest-tools/' references are less cleanly signaled.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A specific, well-triggered description that clearly scopes an authorized wireless security assessment skill with concrete actions and minimal conflict risk. The main gap is the absence of explicit user-mention trigger phrasing and a few missing wireless synonyms.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Wi-Fi capture', 'WPA handshake analysis', 'rogue AP detection research', and 'lab-only deauth testing' — giving comprehensive coverage of the wireless assessment domain.

5 / 5

Completeness

Both what and when are present via 'Use for authorized wireless security assessment including...', but the trigger is merged into one clause without an explicit 'when the user mentions X' phrase, so it is not a clean 5.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Strong natural keywords (Wi-Fi, WPA handshake, rogue AP, deauth) but missing common synonyms users might say such as WPA2/WPA3, 802.11, PMKID, or 'wireless pentesting'.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear wireless-security niche with distinct triggers (WPA handshake, rogue AP, deauth) that are unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.