xiaohongshu
小红书内容工具。使用场景： - 搜索小红书内容 - 获取首页推荐列表 - 获取帖子详情（包括互动数据和评论） - 发表评论到帖子 - 获取用户个人主页 - "跟踪一下小红书上的XX热点" - "分析小红书上关于XX的讨论" - "小红书XX话题报告" - "生成XX的小红书舆情报告"
100
Does it follow best practices?
Validation for skill structure
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that clearly defines its scope for Xiaohongshu (Little Red Book) content operations. It excels in listing specific capabilities, providing natural trigger phrases in Chinese that users would actually say, and explicitly defining use cases. The platform-specific focus makes it highly distinctive and unlikely to conflict with other skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: searching content, getting homepage recommendations, getting post details with engagement data and comments, posting comments, and getting user profiles. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (the specific capabilities like search, get recommendations, post comments) AND 'when' with explicit trigger scenarios using '使用场景' (use cases) including example user queries like '跟踪一下小红书上的XX热点'. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural Chinese terms users would say: '小红书' (Xiaohongshu), '热点' (trending), '分析' (analyze), '讨论' (discussion), '话题报告' (topic report), '舆情报告' (sentiment report). These are natural phrases users would actually use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with clear niche - specifically targets 小红书 (Xiaohongshu/Little Red Book) platform. The platform-specific terminology and Chinese language make it very unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an exemplary skill file that maximizes information density while maintaining clarity. It uses tables effectively for quick reference, provides executable commands throughout, and properly delegates detailed documentation to README.md. The structure supports both quick lookups and sequential workflows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely lean and efficient. Uses tables for quick reference, minimal prose, no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every section serves a clear purpose. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste ready bash commands throughout. The quick start section has numbered executable steps, and examples include actual command syntax with arguments. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequence in quick start (check deps → start service → check status → use). The long image export shows a complete workflow with JSON preparation and command execution. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent structure with clear signposting to README.md for complete documentation. Content is appropriately split between quick reference tables and detailed sections, with one-level-deep references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.