Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear workflow and concrete templates, but it is held back by redundancy that inflates token use, absent validation/feedback loops for the file-modifying steps, and a monolithic structure with no external reference split.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after Execute (e.g. verify the '@@@section' markers resolve in doc.md and the index entry points to the right section before marking complete), with a fix-and-retry loop, to lift workflow_clarity.
Trim redundant directory trees and the full report template, or move the worked mcp-builder example and the report template into a referenced reference file, to improve conciseness and progressive_disclosure.
Split the large report template and worked example into a references file (e.g. references/integration-report-template.md) signaled one level deep from the body to enable a score-3 progressive_disclosure structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~210-line body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude knows, but it is padded with redundancy — directory trees and report templates appear multiple times and the mcp-builder worked example largely restates earlier content — fitting the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor rather than the lean score-3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: '$integrate-skill <skill-name>', exact paths like '.trellis/spec/{target}/doc.md', an '@@@section:...' markdown template, naming conventions ('component.tsx.template'), and a full worked example, matching the 'fully executable; copy-paste ready' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered sequence (Read → Determine Target → Analyze → Execute → Report) is clear, but file/index/batch operations lack explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops; the report's checklist is self-report, not a verify-and-retry step, so it sits at the 'steps listed but validation gaps' anchor and is capped at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and no one-level-deep references are signaled; the single file is well-sectioned but keeps the report template and worked example inline (content that should be separate), fitting the 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline' anchor rather than a score-3 reference-split organization. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |