Content
80%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An actionable, concise orchestration procedure with copy-paste commands and a clear two-path workflow. It is capped by the absence of an explicit validation feedback loop and by all content living inline with no progressive disclosure mechanism.
Suggestions
Add an explicit error-recovery loop after 'task.py validate' (e.g. 'If validation fails: review errors, fix the task config, re-run validate; only start the agent when validation passes').
Consider moving the detailed Manual Configuration sub-steps into a referenced file (e.g. references/manual-config.md) so SKILL.md stays a focused overview.
Introduce more natural user-facing trigger phrasings (e.g. 'develop several features at once', 'run coding tasks in parallel') alongside the technical 'worktree agents' terminology.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, command- and table-driven content with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; minor redundancy ('Don't write code directly' repeats in Role Definition and Core Rules) but every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready executable commands throughout (get_context.py, plan.py, task.py create/init-context/set-branch, start.py) for both the Plan Agent and Manual Configuration paths. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced with a 'task.py validate' checkpoint before launch, but no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop is described for the destructive/batch agent-dispatch operations. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file, well-sectioned, with no bundle files or external references; at ~190 lines it keeps all procedures inline rather than splitting detailed paths (e.g. manual config) into referenced files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |