Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary instruction-only skill body: lean, fully actionable with exact commands, a clearly sequenced two-step workflow with verification and error-reporting feedback loops, and clean section organization with no unnecessary external references. No substantive weaknesses found.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~80-line body is lean: exact commands, a compact auto-completes checklist, and a command reference table, with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; even the dense portability rule consists of operational clauses that each earn their place, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands with real flags (get_context.py --mode record, add_session.py with --stdin heredoc, task.py archive) and concrete verification commands, matching the level-3 anchor rather than the pseudocode level 2. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (Step 1 context/tasks, Step 2 add session) with explicit validation checkpoints ("verify with: git log -1 --oneline; git status --short") and a feedback loop ("report the exact blocker instead of claiming the session was recorded"), matching the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor; it is not level 2 because checkpoints are explicit, not implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files are provided (references/scripts/assets absent) and the skill needs none; the body is well-organized into "Record Work Progress" and "Script Command Reference" sections, which per the simple-skills scoring note earns a 3 for a self-contained, well-structured skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |