Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, fully executable runbook: concrete commands, explicit pre-flight and error checks, honest interpretation guidance for each output field, and a precise delivery format. It stays lean while covering cost, failure modes, and reporting caveats a generic model would not know.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every sentence carries task-specific information the model could not know (radar field semantics, cost model, trend-reading caveats); nothing explains concepts Claude already knows, and the two-sentence name-vs-generic rationale at the top directly drives later steps rather than padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The skill gives a copy-paste-ready command with realistic arguments ("python -m radar keywords \"photocraft\" \"synthid detector\" --repo ... --json"), concrete setup steps (env vars, clone URL, config copy), a field-by-field result-reading guide, and an exact output table spec with column headers. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Setup, pick names, state cost and run, read results, deliver the table — an explicit sequence with real validation checkpoints: stop without an AISA key, state the cost estimate before spending, inspect posts_error/related_errors/country_errors, and handle empty results by offering a re-read in three days. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file (~55 lines) with well-organized sections and no bundle files; no content is inlined that belongs in a separate file, and the only external pointer (the GitHub repo to clone) is an operational dependency, not a buried reference. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |