Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an excellent lean, fully actionable instruction sheet with an unambiguous single-action workflow and a built-in failure feedback loop. Its one real structural defect is that the bundled references/action_semantics.md file is never mentioned, so its complementary details are unreachable through navigation.
Suggestions
Add a pointer to the bundled reference, e.g., under a 'Details' line: "For action semantics (receptacle state requirements, related actions), see [action_semantics.md](references/action_semantics.md)" — this would surface details like the fridge not needing to be open.
Deduplicate the Prerequisites section against Execution Flow step 1 'Verify State' by merging them into a single checklist.
Trim the 'Example from Trajectory' section to just the action and observation, since the state setup repeats the prerequisites.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~25-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with no explanation of known concepts, matching the 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' anchor. It is not a 5 because the Prerequisites section ('Object in Hand', 'At Cooling Receptacle') is restated in Execution Flow step 1 'Verify State', and the Example from Trajectory largely repeats the execution flow. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: the exact command format `cool {obj} with {recep}`, a copy-paste example `cool pot 1 with fridge 1`, literal success/failure observation strings ("You cool the {obj} using the {recep}." / "Nothing happened"), and the next-step command `put {obj} in/on {recep}`. This matches the 'fully executable; copy-paste ready; specific examples cover the common cases' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | For this simple single-action skill the action is unambiguous, and the flow verify-state → execute → verify-outcome includes an explicit validation checkpoint with a feedback loop ("If the observation is 'Nothing happened'... check the prerequisites or try a different receptacle"). Per the simple-skill guideline this merits the top anchor; the operation is neither destructive nor batch. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body itself is well-organized into clear sections, but the bundle contains references/action_semantics.md — which holds genuinely useful details (the receptacle need not be open, related actions such as `heat` and `take`) — and the body never references or links to it anywhere. Scoring against the actual bundle structure, this is an orphaned, undiscoverable reference, matching 'references present but not clearly signaled' rather than the 'references mostly clear' anchor above. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |