Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clean, actionable, well-sequenced body for a simple skill, with concrete commands and a validation/feedback loop. Its main gap is progressive disclosure: a useful reference file is bundled but never linked from the body.
Suggestions
Add a one-line pointer to the bundled reference, e.g. under Core Action: 'See [references/action_semantics.md](references/action_semantics.md) for valid receptacles and the full cool/heat action semantics.'
Move the duplicated detail currently inline (e.g., the 'Nothing happened' failure cases and valid-receptacle list) into action_semantics.md and summarize it in the body to avoid drift between the two.
Pull the non-obvious note from the reference ('the fridge does not need to be open') into the Prerequisites section, since it is decision-relevant and not derivable from the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — Purpose, Prerequisites, Core Action, Execution Flow, Example, Next Steps — and assumes Claude's competence without explaining what ALFWorld or a fridge is; the slight restatement between Prerequisites and 'Verify State' is a deliberate validation checkpoint, not padding, so it stays at the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives the exact command format 'cool {obj} with {recep}' and a fully concrete worked example 'cool pot 1 with fridge 1' producing the expected observation, which is copy-paste ready within ALFWorld rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Execution Flow is explicitly sequenced (Verify State → Execute → Verify Outcome) with an error-recovery feedback loop ('If the observation is "Nothing happened,"... check the prerequisites or try a different receptacle'); for a simple single-action skill this matches the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned but never references the existing bundle file references/action_semantics.md, which holds non-trivial detail (receptacle need not be open, common valid receptacles, related actions) — a signaling gap against the actual bundle structure. It is not level 3 because a one-level-deep reference exists but is not signaled, and not level 1 because internal organization is clear with no nested references. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |