Content
55%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably concise and well-sectioned, but it is fatally incomplete: it promises 'the following action' and then stops, so the agent never receives the actual command to execute, and the bundled trajectory example that contains the concrete action format is never referenced. The prerequisites are the only genuinely actionable part.
Suggestions
Complete the 'Core Action Sequence' section with the exact action template, e.g. 'take {obj} from {recep}' using the IDs from the confirming observation, so the skill is executable as written.
Add a brief success-confirmation step (e.g., expect an observation like 'You pick up the {obj} from the {recep}') so the agent can verify the object entered its inventory.
Link the bundled reference from the body (e.g., 'See [trajectory_example.md](references/trajectory_example.md) for a full worked example') so the existing file is discoverable rather than orphaned.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence: prerequisites are stated in two terse numbered items with a concrete observation template ("On the {recep}, you see a {obj}..."), and there is no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every line earns its place, matching the anchor 5 example of minimal, well-organized instruction; a 4 would require over-explanation that is simply absent. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The 'Core Action Sequence' section says 'Execute the following action precisely:' and then ends — the actual action (e.g., 'take {obj} from {recep}') is never given in the body, so there are no executable instructions at all. It is above anchor 1 only because the prerequisites include one concrete observation format and the proximity requirement, but the specific step to execute is missing entirely. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough sequence is implied (visual confirmation, proximity, then an action) but the central step — the action itself — is absent, leaving the workflow poorly defined with a major gap. The simple-skill exception (score 5 for a single unambiguous action) cannot apply because the single action is not stated; it also lacks any confirmation step that the pickup succeeded. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is short and cleanly sectioned (Instructions / Prerequisites / Core Action Sequence), which for a sub-50-line simple skill would merit a 5. However, the bundle contains references/trajectory_example.md, which is never mentioned or linked from the body, so the one bundled reference is orphaned rather than clearly signaled — a minor organization gap that maps to anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |