Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable body with a clear validated workflow and concrete transcripts. The main structural weakness is progressive disclosure: the existing receptacle suitability reference is orphaned — never signaled from SKILL.md — so its heuristics are undiscoverable when the agent needs them most.
Suggestions
In step 2's table (or the "Unsuitable" row), add a pointer such as: "For detailed receptacle suitability heuristics, see [receptacle_suitability_guide.md](references/receptacle_suitability_guide.md)" so the bundled reference is discoverable.
In the Error Handling section's "Receptacle unsuitable" bullet, link the suitability guide before deferring to the object-locator skill, giving the agent a concrete evaluation protocol instead of only a redirect.
Trim the redundancy between the "When to Use" section and the description, and drop the "Agent not at receptacle" error-handling bullet that repeats step 1's navigation instruction, to push conciseness toward a 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — a state table instead of prose, no explanation of what ALFWorld or receptacles are, and tight command templates. It misses a 5 because of small redundancies: the "When to Use" section reiterates the description, and the Error Handling bullet "Agent not at receptacle: Navigate..." duplicates step 1's "If not at the receptacle, navigate there first". | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: exact commands (`go to {target_receptacle}`, `open {target_receptacle}`, `put {object_name} in/on {target_receptacle}`, `inventory`) and two complete copy-paste-ready transcripts with real observations covering the two main cases (closed container, open surface). Error handling is keyed to a concrete observation string ("Nothing happened"). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step sequence (validate prerequisites → check receptacle state → execute → verify placement) has explicit checkpoints: step 1 confirms holding/location, step 4 confirms the observation shows the object in/on the receptacle, and the Error Handling section supplies recovery loops for failed placements. This is a simple, non-destructive skill, so the batch/destruction cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body itself is well organized into scannable sections, but the bundle contains `references/receptacle_suitability_guide.md` — whose suitability heuristics (e.g., "Countertops: typically not storage locations") directly inform step 2's "Unsuitable" row and the Error Handling section — and the body never links to or mentions it. This matches the 3 anchor ("references present but not clearly signaled") rather than 4 ("references mostly clear"), since there is zero navigation from SKILL.md to the one reference file. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |