Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body presents a clear, sequenced procedure with some concrete commands and error handling, appropriate for a simple navigation skill. However, it is padded with trajectory-specific narration, leaves the candidate-enumeration step vague, and fails to surface its own bundle files, whose content it partially duplicates inline. It is a usable but not well-integrated skill body.
Suggestions
Reference the bundle files explicitly, e.g., "See [references/environment_guide.md](references/environment_guide.md) for receptacle types and observation patterns" and "Use assets/search_pattern_template.json to plan the search action sequence", and remove the duplicated inline environment knowledge.
Remove trajectory-narration sentences ("The trajectory demonstrates checking 20 cabinets...", "The trajectory shows that...") and replace them with the general rule they imply, e.g., "Closed cabinets rarely contain standalone receptacles like garbage cans; check open surfaces first."
Make step 3 executable: specify how to build the candidate list from the initial observation (enumerate all receptacle ids in the observation) and when to use the 'smart' vs 'exhaustive' strategy defined in the template asset.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient but padded with narration about an unseen trajectory ("The trajectory demonstrates checking 20 cabinets before finally locating the garbage can", "The trajectory shows that the target receptacle (garbagecan 1) was not inside any closed cabinet") and a Key Notes section repeating environment knowledge. This matches anchor 3 (mostly efficient, some unnecessary explanation) rather than anchor 4, since several sentences could be cut outright. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | There is concrete guidance (the `go to {recep}` action, the "Nothing happened" error handling, the target-extraction example from "put a cool lettuce in garbagecan"), but the core executable step — how to enumerate and prioritize candidate receptacles from the initial observation — remains vague, and the provided asset template is never used. This is anchor 3's incomplete concrete guidance rather than anchor 4's minor gaps. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five steps (Identify Target, Initial Check, Systematic Search, Persistence, Output) are clearly sequenced and an error-handling note covers the "Nothing happened" case. It falls short of anchor 5 because there is no explicit validation checkpoint for confirming the target is found, and the skip-closed-cabinets rule is conditional and derived from one trajectory rather than a general rule. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle contains references/environment_guide.md and assets/search_pattern_template.json, but the body never links to or mentions either file — orphaned bundle content — while environment knowledge and a search-pattern example are instead inlined in the body. This matches anchor 3 (references present but not clearly signaled; content that should be separate is inline); it is not anchor 2 because the body itself is short and well-sectioned. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |