Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is actionable and clearly sequenced with a good worked example, but it is held back by an empty template stub and a bundle reference file that is not linked or signaled anywhere in the content.
Suggestions
Remove or fill in the empty "Thought Process Template" section so it does not consume tokens without delivering content.
Link references/alfworld_actions_ref.md from the body (e.g., under a short "Action reference" note) so the existing bundle file is discoverable.
Add a brief observation-based validation note in the verification step (e.g., confirm "Nothing happened" is not returned) to make the re-inspection checkpoint explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the "Thought Process Template" section is a stub heading with no content beneath it, wasting tokens. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-pasteable action templates ("go to {recep}", "open {recep}", "take {obj} from {recep}") plus a fully worked Thought/Action/Observation example. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered four-step sequence with explicit verification logic and a checklist-style revisit; the read-only re-inspection task does not require destructive-operation feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized for a simple skill, but a real bundle file (references/alfworld_actions_ref.md) exists yet is never referenced or linked in the body, so navigation to it is not signaled. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |