Content
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, clearly sequenced search procedure with a solid worked example, undermined by a dangling reference to a non-existent script and reference files that are present but never pointed to. The action list also overlaps with the core process.
Suggestions
Provide the referenced `prioritize_rooms.py` in a `scripts/` directory or replace the instruction with an inline heuristic for ordering candidate rooms.
Link the existing reference files from the body (e.g., 'For action details, see [action_guide.md](references/action_guide.md)') and move the duplicated action list out of the main body to reduce redundancy.
Trim the overlap between 'Key Actions' and 'Core Process' so each section earns its tokens — keep the concrete action forms in one place only.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the 'Key Actions' section largely repeats the teleport/look around/examine actions already covered in 'Core Process', adding redundancy. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Actions are concrete and well-illustrated by the thermometer example, but the body instructs use of a 'provided `prioritize_rooms.py` script' that does not exist in the bundle — a missing key detail that breaks executability. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Core Process is a clearly sequenced loop with an explicit validation checkpoint ('If the object is found, stop the search') and a defined termination/reporting step, fitting a simple search skill. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized, but the existing reference files (action_guide.md, action_primer.md, example_trajectory_breakdown.md) are never linked from the body, while a referenced script (prioritize_rooms.py) is absent — navigation is not clearly signaled. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |