Content
52%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body presents a clear, well-sectioned workflow with explicit before/after validation for this batch operation, and the action pattern is named. Its main weaknesses are the orphaned reference files (duplicated inline instead of linked), the absence of a worked example command, and repeated scope restatements across sections.
Suggestions
Link the existing bundle files explicitly (e.g., "See [references/action_patterns.md](references/action_patterns.md) for the concrete action syntax and ambiguity trajectory, and [references/prerequisite_checklist.md](references/prerequisite_checklist.md) for the full pre-planting checklist and failure points") instead of inlining abbreviated versions.
Include one worked example command in the body, such as `move banana seed in seed jar to flower pot 1`, to make the `move OBJ to OBJ` template executable.
Consolidate the redundant scope statements across Purpose, Core Workflow, and Important Notes into a single brief scope note to tighten token use.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with specific commands, but the Purpose section restates the frontmatter description and Important Notes repeats scope/prerequisite points already given in Core Workflow ("This skill assumes containers are already prepared with soil"), which is more than the minor trimming of the 4 anchor but not the padded concept explanations of the 2 anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance exists ("Use the `move OBJ to OBJ` action pattern", "`examine` or `look at`", "seed jar") but the core action is a placeholder template with no worked example command; the concrete instantiation ("move banana seed in seed jar to flower pot 1") exists only in references/action_patterns.md, which the body never cites. More than high-level hints (2), less than fully executable guidance (4). | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Prerequisites → per-container Execution → Completion sequence is present with explicit validation ("Always verify the state of the container (`examine` or `look at`) before and after planting to confirm success") plus ambiguity-resolution handling. It falls short of the 5 anchor because there is no error-recovery feedback loop for what to do when verification fails, and validation is explicitly present so the 3 anchor does not fit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle provides references/action_patterns.md and references/prerequisite_checklist.md, but the body never references either file, while inlining abbreviated duplicates of their content (ambiguity resolution, prerequisites). The reference files' concrete trajectory examples and failure points are undiscoverable from SKILL.md — references are not merely unclearly signaled (3) but entirely unlinked; the body itself is well-sectioned, so the monolithic 1 anchor does not fit. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |