Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, actionable, well-sequenced skill body with concrete commands and verification steps. Its single defect is a progressive-disclosure reference to a missing bundle file.
Suggestions
Add the referenced scripts/conductivity_test.py file (or create the scripts/ directory) so the bundled-logic reference resolves, or remove the reference and inline the conductivity steps.
Confirm the referenced script path matches the actual bundle layout before pointing Claude to it, to avoid a dead reference during execution.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body with no explanatory fluff about concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place and assumes competence. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands ('move OBJ to CONTAINER', 'move metal pot to blue box', 'look around') and a worked example rather than abstract direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear four-step sequence (Verify Context, Confirm Test Result, Apply Rule, Execute Archive) with explicit verification checkpoints such as confirming the test outcome and visually confirming the target container. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized, but the body references a bundled script 'scripts/conductivity_test.py' that does not exist in any scripts/ directory, leaving the one external reference broken. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |