Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and well-sequenced with strong validation checkpoints and a worked example, appropriate for an irreversible purchase action. The main weakness is progressive disclosure: an existing reference trajectory file is not linked or surfaced from the body.
Suggestions
Add a clearly signaled link to the bundled reference, e.g. a '## Example trajectory' section pointing to 'references/trajectory_example.md', so the file is discoverable.
De-duplicate the budget-check and option-selection content between 'When to Use' and 'Verification Logic' to tighten conciseness.
Consider moving the full worked example into the reference file and keeping only a compact pointer inline to improve structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with clear sections and no padding about concepts Claude already knows, but the budget-check and option-selection content is restated across 'When to Use' and 'Verification Logic', leaving minor trim opportunities. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, specific guidance: the exact action 'click[buy now]', three named checks with concrete fields ('Price:', selected state, product title), and a worked example covering the common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences the purchase with explicit validation checkpoints (budget, option, product match) before the irreversible click, plus an error-recovery feedback loop ('If any check fails... revert to selecting... or searching for a different product'). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized, but the provided bundle file 'references/trajectory_example.md' is never referenced or linked from the body, so the reference is present but not clearly signaled and effectively undiscoverable. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |