Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean policy skill with concrete classifier and validation commands, clear decision tables, and explicit positive/negative/grey examples. Main residual gaps are the unsequenced avatar-archive lane and dense multi-point paragraphs that could be broken into lists.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, house-specific policy prose (e.g. "用户说 review 不等于授权落盘", "行数不入模型") that assumes Claude's competence and contains no padding of known concepts. Not 5 because a few run-on blocks (the PR-path governance paragraph, the avatar-archive prose) could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands are provided ("pnpm classify:co-creation-docs -- --base origin/main --conflict none --reversibility one_commit", "node scripts/check-frontmatter.mjs --strict-delta --base origin/main") plus decision tables and enumerated criteria. Minor gaps remain: the avatar lane has no commands and "跑轻量增量校验" defers to elsewhere rather than inlining the command. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequencing: intent gate → classification evidence → per-delivery numbered steps with explicit checkpoints (validation first, staged-diff check, evidence report), so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply. Not 5 because the static_asset_archive lane is prose without an explicit step sequence and validate→fix→retry loops are not spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single-file skill with well-organized sections (价值门禁 → 先判意图 → 分类证据 → 按输出交付 → 正反灰例 → Common Mistakes → 验证 → skill 区别 → 下一步) and no bundle files to reference. Not 5 because at ~110 lines the dense lanes (avatar archive, governance paragraph) could be split into reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |