Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, well-sequenced instruction skill: the four-gate workflow has explicit validation checkpoints and a concrete mistakes ledger, and the writing is highly token-efficient. The main defect is that all four external references point to files absent from the bundle, so the disclosure structure cannot actually be navigated.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced files (interaction-narrative.md, design-in-context-checklist.md, f190-frontend-lessons.md) inside the skill's references/ directory, or correct the paths so `../.cat-cafe-shared-refs/` and `docs/architecture/feature-placement.md` resolve from the skill root.
Give Gate 4's screenshot/browser proof one concrete example (e.g. which command or preview flow produces the evidence), since that step currently relies on the sibling browser-preview skill without saying how to invoke it.
Inline a one-line decision summary for docs/architecture/feature-placement.md (or remove the reference) so the L1–L4 entry decision remains actionable when the external file is unavailable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and telegraphic with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows — e.g. the Implementation Gate is a bare table ('200 行 | 触发拆分审查', '350 行 | 默认必须拆，除非结构理由写清楚') and Gate 4 is a terse evidence checklist. Every line carries a rule or threshold; it assumes competence throughout. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance for an instruction-only skill: specific thresholds ('200 行', '350 行'), named state coverage ('loading / empty / partial / full / error'), explicit migration fields ('Source Behavior / Must Preserve Home Behavior / Decision / Proof'), and a mistakes table with fixes. Falls short of 5 because some guidance stays abstract ('在真实宿主和可信内容态里验证主对象、主动作与状态反馈') and it delegates to referenced files that are not present in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four gates form a clear numbered sequence ('先定入口和状态，再写组件') with an explicit validation section ('必须给证据' checklist covering golden path, non-happy-path state, sibling-page sampling, modal checks, dark/mobile sampling) and a feedback loop in the Common Mistakes table (错误 → 后果 → 修复). This matches the checklist-plus-recovery anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are clearly signaled and annotated ('`../.cat-cafe-shared-refs/f190-frontend-lessons.md` — F190 Console intake 的具体案例', '`docs/architecture/feature-placement.md` — Console 入口层级决策树'), but none of the referenced paths resolve — the bundle has no references/ directory and `../.cat-cafe-shared-refs/` and `docs/architecture/` do not exist relative to the skill. Navigation breaks at every external pointer, which is more than a minor organization gap. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |