CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

cross-thread-sync

跨 thread 协同:通知、归属核验、争用与责任处置。Use when: 平行 session 通知或共享文件争用。Not for: 跨猫交接或新建 thread。Output: routed cross-post + disposition。GOTCHA: ACTION/BLOCKING 不转移球权。

63

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./cat-cafe-skills/cross-thread-sync/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-sequenced, actionable coordination skill with strong validation gates and concrete tool calls, undermined mainly by length/repetition and a monolithic structure that inlines separable reference material. Splitting peripheral sections into reference files and trimming restated rules would lift the weaker dimensions.

Suggestions

Move the F246 Phase J Dispatch Proposal Lifecycle and Ghost Thread Bug sections into separate reference files (e.g. references/dispatch-proposals.md) linked from the body, to improve progressive_disclosure.

De-duplicate the routing铁律 — state it once at the top and reference it from Step 2 instead of restating, and consolidate the ACK三义 explanation to reduce repetition.

Tighten the dense Chinese prose in the 爪感差 and 入站门禁 sections into table/checklist form to cut tokens while preserving the validation logic.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is information-dense and table-driven assuming domain knowledge, but at ~225 lines it restates the routing rule (top + Step 2) and revisits ACK semantics, so it is mostly efficient with some tightening opportunity rather than lean.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete executable tool calls with parameters (cat_cafe_cross_post_message, cat_cafe_feat_index, cat_cafe_list_threads) and exact Claim/Release message templates, with only minor placeholder gaps keeping it below fully copy-paste-ready 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear Step 1→4 sequence is backed by explicit validation checkpoints (入站门禁 三问, verified/mismatch/insufficient disposition table) and failure-mode feedback loops; validation is present for the shared-file contention case, so the destructive-cap does not apply.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and all content is inline in a >50-line file; self-contained reference blocks like F246 Phase J and the Ghost Thread Bug could live in separate files, so structure is present but separation is lacking.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A tightly structured description that clearly states what, when, and not-for, with an explicit boundary against sibling skills. Its only weakness is that the coordination-domain actions read slightly more abstractly than a fully concrete capability list.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names several concrete actions ("通知、归属核验、争用与责任处置" and output "routed cross-post + disposition"), though the coordination-domain actions are slightly more abstract than a fully enumerated PDF-style list, so it sits at 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers what ("跨 thread 协同:通知、归属核验、争用与责任处置"), when ("Use when: 平行 session 通知或共享文件争用"), and adds Not-for/Output/GOTCHA, matching the anchor for clear what-and-when with concrete triggers.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user phrases like "平行 session 通知" and "共享文件争用" plus "跨 thread", giving good coverage, but a few common synonyms/variations are absent from the description field itself, keeping it below 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The explicit "Not for: 跨猫交接或新建 thread" boundary carves out a clear niche from cross-cat-handoff and thread creation, with minimal overlap risk.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
zts212653/clowder-ai
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.