Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete templates and a clearly sequenced, checkpointed workflow, and it is well-organized with clearly signaled one-level references. Its main weakness is conciseness: the core non-goal and the 盲点正交性 rationale are reiterated more than strictly necessary.
Suggestions
Consolidate the "finding generator, not approval authority" non-goal: state it authoritatively once in 身份约束 and reference it (rather than re-explaining) in the Finding List footer, 和正式 Review table, and Common Mistakes.
Explain 盲点正交性 once in its dedicated section and have the 方式 A / 方式 B notes reference it instead of re-deriving the rationale each time.
Consider extracting the Finding List template + Category/Severity rules into a reference file if the skill grows, to keep the main body scannable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and table-driven, but the "finding generator, not approval authority" non-goal is repeated across the 身份约束 section, Finding List footer, 和正式 Review table, and Common Mistakes, and 盲点正交性 is re-explained in several places — mostly efficient but could be tightened. Not a 3 because the redundancy is not load-bearing in every occurrence; not a 1 because there is no padding about concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready guidance: the 方式 A @-message template, the markdown Finding List template, the Category enum, Severity rules, and `fixed (commit {sha})` / `dismissed: {理由}` annotations are concrete and executable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequencing with a preconditions checklist (前條件 table), numbered Ownership/Agent/Author steps, and a fix-or-dismiss feedback loop including a 假阳性 review checkpoint. Not below 2 because checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/scripts/assets absent), but the single document is well-organized into clear sections and its references to sibling skills (receive-review, refs/review-request-template.md, sop-definitions/development.yaml) are one level deep and clearly signaled. Not below 2 because navigation is easy and references are not deeply nested. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |