quality-gate

开发完成后的自检门禁：愿景对照 + spec 合规 + 验证。 Use when: 准备对交付作完成声明、需要整理风险匹配的自证。 Not for: 收到 review 反馈（用 receive-review）、merge（用 merge-gate）。 Output: Spec 合规报告（含愿景覆盖度）。

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, well-sequenced gate skill with concrete commands, validation checkpoints, and a report template. It is token-dense rather than padded, though some rationale/lessons and the full report template could be offloaded to reference files to tighten the body.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Dense, symbol-driven prose that assumes Claude's competence and never explains basic concepts, but the F-lesson asides and Common Mistakes table partially restate guidance already in the flow, so it is not a 5.	4 / 5
Actionability	Provides copy-paste-ready commands (curl -sf …/health, pnpm gate, node scripts/check-hotfix-pattern.mjs, git status --short \| rg …, gh pr list) and a concrete report template covering the common cases.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Step 0 through Step 8 are explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints (Step 7 exit-code read, Step 7.5 BLOCK gate), feedback loops ('任一实际选择的检查红都先修'), and checklists, satisfying the destructive/batch validation requirement.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized sections with clearly signaled one-level-deep references to ../.cat-cafe-shared-refs/*.md and the SOP definition; not a 5 because no bundle files exist and several inlined rule blocks (F177 phases, full report template) could live in separate reference files.	4 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that states what the skill does, when to use it, and what it is not for, backed by a natural-language triggers list. Minor room to sharpen the action verbs from abstract labels to more concrete operations.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (自检门禁) and three concrete actions (愿景对照, spec 合规, 验证), matching the 'lists several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor; not a 5 because the actions are somewhat abstract rather than fully concrete.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('自检门禁：愿景对照 + spec 合规 + 验证') and when ('Use when: 准备对交付作完成声明') with concrete trigger phrases, so it is not capped at 3.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	The triggers list ('开发完了', '准备 review', '自检', '声称完成') plus 'Use when: 准备对交付作完成声明' provides comprehensive natural phrases with synonyms users would actually say.	5 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The 'Not for: 收到 review 反馈（用 receive-review）、merge（用 merge-gate）' clause gives a clear niche with explicit boundaries against sibling skills, minimizing conflict risk.	5 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 2 missing	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: zts212653/clowder-ai
Path: cat-cafe-skills/quality-gate/SKILL.md
Commit: 090626a

Reviewed: ~23 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.