Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary operational skill body: a sequenced pipeline with named roles and validation gates, copy-paste deterministic processing commands, hard-won failure rules that encode knowledge Claude doesn't have, and heavy material correctly pushed to on-demand reference files. The only weakness is minor token overhead from the origin story and repeated incident-date citations.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence — commands are given bare, no concept explanations, and the failure lessons (工艺红线, Common Mistakes) are exactly what Claude couldn't know. Minor trimmable overhead remains: the origin narrative ("> 出生：F229 … operator 连续两次 identity veto 后拉闸") and repeated date citations ("2026-07-08 实录", "2026-06-22~24") are provenance, not instructions. This fits anchor 4 (efficient, minor instances that could be trimmed) better than anchor 5's 'every token earns its place'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The Step-4 chain is copy-paste ready with exact parameters ("ffmpeg -i video.mp4 -vf \"fps=4\" frame_%02d.png", "magick f1.png -resize 192x208 -gravity center -extent 192x208 cell_01.png", "-resize 59x64 preview.png # 必做"), the prompt idiom is given verbatim ("Only differences: ... Everything else IDENTICAL"), and fallbacks for common failure cases are concrete ("B 帧锁不住… → 降级单图 i2v 只用 A 帧", "脏边则重跑 despill"). Specific examples cover the common cases, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step pipeline table sequences who/what/constraints per step, and validation is explicit and layered: "三道闸 + operator identity veto 终审", "每批过了才做下一批（2-2-3 批次制先例）" — a batch operation with per-batch gates, so the missing-validation cap of 3 does not apply. Error-recovery feedback loops are present (fallback to single-image i2v, "抽卡 2-3 败即换姿势写法别硬 roll", "修正成功版按红线 6 回流"). This matches anchor 5's 'explicit validation steps; feedback loops; checklists'. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a ~70-line overview and explicitly delegates heavy material: "真相源（重材料按需读，不复制进上下文）" lists four one-level-deep references, each labeled with its content (prompt template library, prompt pack, cell spec/gates, pet.json format example). No bundle files exist in this review workspace to verify the external repo paths, but as written the structure matches anchor 5: clear overview, well-signaled one-level references, easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |