Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and well-sequenced with explicit validation and feedback loops, and it is concise for its depth. The main gap is purely structural: it is a single long file with no progressive disclosure via references.
Suggestions
Trim the 面板快捷入口 section, which partly restates guidance already covered in the scenario table, to tighten conciseness.
Consider splitting the full tool-parameter reference and the 常见问题 FAQ into a reference file linked one level deep, to strengthen progressive disclosure.
Add a brief '验证文件存在后再调用' reminder inline next to the Step 3 call examples so the validation checkpoint is co-located with the action.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and practical — tables throughout, no padding, no explaining of basic concepts like glob or files — with only minor trim opportunities (the panel-shortcut section partly restates earlier guidance). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance: per-intent glob/grep patterns and concrete cat_cafe_workspace_navigate({ path, action, worktreeId, threadId, line }) calls with real example paths covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (intent → path search → call MCP) with explicit validation ('先 glob/grep 确认文件存在，再调 API'), a multi-result checkpoint, and a deliveryStatus → next-action feedback loop for error recovery on queued/blocked/unconfirmed. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single self-contained file with no bundle files and clean section/table navigation; since there are no one-level-deep references to signal, it does not perfectly fit the top anchor, but the organization is strong with only minor room to split the tool reference or FAQ out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |