Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, actionable skill that provides a clear methodology for classifying ECC components with repo evidence. Its strongest aspects are the concrete workflow steps, verification requirements, and specific output format. Minor weaknesses include some redundancy between sections and the opportunity to split detailed reference material into separate files for better progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Consider extracting the evidence table format and parallel review pass details into a separate reference file to reduce the main skill's length
Trim the 'When to Use' section—several bullets overlap with the opening description and Classification Model section
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient but has some redundancy—the 'When to Use' section overlaps with the opening line, and some sections (like Classification Model) restate what's already implied by the evidence table. The bullet lists are clean but could be tighter in places. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete bash commands for evidence gathering, a specific text-based evidence table format, explicit file paths for outputs, clear classification criteria with examples, and a defined output format. The guidance is specific enough to execute without ambiguity. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step core workflow is clearly sequenced with numbered steps, includes a verification step (step 6) with specific checks, and has explicit criteria for promotion/demotion decisions. The parallel review passes are well-defined with clear scope boundaries, and the handoff section provides error recovery paths. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-structured with clear sections, but it's a fairly long monolithic document that could benefit from splitting the evidence table format, the library router template, and the parallel pass details into separate reference files. The handoff references to other skills are good, but the skill itself doesn't reference any supplementary docs. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |