Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured operator workflow skill that excels at conciseness and progressive disclosure. The workflow is clearly sequenced with appropriate validation checkpoints. The main weakness is that actionability could be improved with concrete command examples (git commands, common test runners) rather than purely procedural descriptions.
Suggestions
Add concrete command examples in the workflow steps, e.g., `git status`, `git diff HEAD`, `git log --oneline -5` for 'inspect git state', to make the guidance more immediately executable.
Include a brief concrete example showing the full workflow applied to a real scenario (e.g., a failing test), demonstrating the output format filled in with actual values.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient throughout. Every section earns its place—no explanations of basic concepts, no padding. The guardrails, workflow steps, and status words are all tightly written and assume Claude's competence. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The workflow provides clear procedural guidance with specific status words and a structured output format, but lacks concrete executable commands or code examples. Steps like 'inspect the error' and 'inspect git state' are directional rather than specifying exact commands (e.g., `git status`, `git diff`, `git log --oneline -5`). | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit 'read before write' checkpoint, a narrowing discipline for fixes, and clear status reporting. The guardrail 'do not claim fixed until the proving command was rerun' serves as a validation checkpoint, and the verification section adds explicit feedback loop requirements. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The 'Skill Stack' section provides clear one-level-deep references to related skills with brief descriptions of when each applies. The content is well-organized into logical sections (When to Use, Guardrails, Workflow, Output Format, Pitfalls, Verification) without being monolithic or deeply nested. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |