Get test coverage on an Express/Node API fast — the first 5 tests that catch
94
90%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
100%
1.26xAverage score across 5 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
{
"context": "Tests whether the agent writes error format consistency tests following the skill's pattern: checking that multiple distinct error conditions (validation failure and 404) all return responses with the same shape, specifically an error object with a message string.",
"type": "weighted_checklist",
"checklist": [
{
"name": "tests multiple error types",
"description": "The test file (or a single test within it) exercises at least two different error conditions — at minimum one 400 (validation) response and one 404 (not found) response",
"max_score": 20
},
{
"name": "error.message checked",
"description": "Tests assert that the response body contains an 'error' object with a 'message' property that is a string (e.g. expect(res.body.error.message).toBeDefined() and/or typeof check)",
"max_score": 25
},
{
"name": "consistent shape assertion",
"description": "Both error types are checked for the SAME shape (the test doesn't allow different structures for different error types — both must have error.message)",
"max_score": 20
},
{
"name": "supertest usage",
"description": "Tests use request(app) from supertest to make HTTP requests to the API",
"max_score": 10
},
{
"name": "error-format-spec created",
"description": "A separate documentation file (error-format-spec.md or similar) describes the expected error response shape",
"max_score": 10
},
{
"name": "no Express internals tested",
"description": "Tests do NOT assert that responses are JSON (e.g. no check that res.type === 'application/json' or that res.headers['content-type'] contains 'json') — focuses on the body shape only",
"max_score": 15
}
]
}