CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

tessl-labs/aspnet-security-basics

Security defaults that belong in every ASP.NET Core application from day one.

87

1.91x
Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

94%

1.91x

Average score across 5 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Discovery

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong skill description that excels in specificity and completeness, clearly listing concrete security features and providing explicit trigger conditions. The main weakness is trigger term quality - while it covers technical terms well, it could benefit from including more natural language phrases users might say when requesting security improvements.

Suggestions

Add natural language trigger terms like 'secure my ASP.NET app', 'add security to my web API', or 'protect my .NET application' to capture how users naturally request security features.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete security features: CORS, HTTPS redirection, HSTS, security headers, rate limiting, anti-forgery, authentication, authorization, Data Protection API, input validation, and Content Security Policy.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what (security defaults including CORS, HTTPS, HSTS, etc.) and when ('whenever you create or modify any ASP.NET Core app', 'If you are writing builder.Services.AddControllers()'). Explicit trigger guidance is provided.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes technical terms like 'ASP.NET Core', 'CORS', 'HSTS', 'security headers' which are relevant but may miss natural user phrases like 'secure my app', 'add security', or 'protect my API'. The trigger 'builder.Services.AddControllers()' is very specific but narrow.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive with clear niche: ASP.NET Core security specifically. The combination of framework-specific terminology and comprehensive security feature list makes it unlikely to conflict with general security or other framework skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Implementation

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a highly actionable and well-structured security skill with excellent executable code examples and clear WRONG/RIGHT patterns. The workflow clarity is strong with explicit middleware ordering and a comprehensive checklist. However, the document is lengthy and could be more concise by reducing redundant emphasis on mandatory nature and splitting detailed subsections into referenced files.

Suggestions

Reduce repetitive emphasis on 'these are mandatory/not optional' - state it once clearly at the top and trust Claude to follow

Consider splitting detailed subsections (CSP configuration, FluentValidation setup, Data Protection API) into separate reference files with brief summaries in the main skill

Remove the car/seatbelt analogy and similar explanatory prose - the WRONG/RIGHT code patterns already communicate the importance effectively

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is comprehensive but includes some unnecessary explanation (e.g., 'the same way you would not ship a car without seatbelts' analogy, repeated emphasis that these are mandatory). The WRONG/RIGHT pattern is useful but adds length; some sections could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

Excellent actionability with fully executable, copy-paste ready code examples for every security feature. Each section shows both wrong and right approaches with complete, working C# code including proper using statements and configuration.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Clear middleware pipeline order section explicitly shows the correct sequence. The checklist at the end provides validation checkpoints. Each section has clear before/after patterns showing what to avoid and what to implement.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a monolithic document (~500 lines) that could benefit from splitting detailed sections (like CSP configuration, FluentValidation setup) into separate reference files. The verifiers section at the end references external files, but the main content is all inline.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation9 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (708 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

9

/

11

Passed

Reviewed

Table of Contents