Analyze eval results, diagnose low-scoring criteria, fix tile content, and re-run evals — the full improvement loop automated
94
Quality
89%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
98%
1.30xAverage score across 7 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
reads_tile_files_before_fixing
0%
100%
proposes_before_applying
100%
100%
targeted_fix_not_rewrite
0%
100%
commits_before_rerun
66%
66%
workspace_in_eval_run
0%
0%
Without context: $0.3257 · 2m 38s · 40 turns · 412 in / 15,014 out tokens
With context: $0.1912 · 1m 36s · 33 turns · 312 in / 8,577 out tokens
runs_eval_view
0%
100%
runs_eval_compare_with_workspace
0%
50%
classifies_into_four_buckets
0%
75%
prioritizes_bucket_d
0%
100%
asks_before_fixing
0%
100%
Without context: $0.2341 · 2m 16s · 29 turns · 283 in / 15,234 out tokens
With context: $0.1459 · 1m 57s · 22 turns · 434 in / 9,368 out tokens
Retry count contradiction found
100%
100%
Auth failure contradiction found
100%
100%
All three files referenced
100%
100%
File attribution per contradiction
100%
100%
Auth contradiction despite scope
100%
100%
Verbatim quotes included
100%
100%
Without context: $0.0621 · 49s · 10 turns · 111 in / 5,671 out tokens
With context: $0.0773 · 1m 1s · 11 turns · 128 in / 7,043 out tokens
Bucket A: idempotency key
100%
100%
Bucket B: webhook signature
100%
87%
Bucket C: HTTP status codes
100%
100%
Bucket B: currency precision
100%
87%
Bucket D: API version pinning
100%
100%
Bucket D highest priority
100%
100%
Bucket B diagnosis present
100%
46%
Bucket C action suggested
70%
60%
Bucket A no-action
100%
100%
80% threshold applied
90%
90%
Without context: $0.0528 · 40s · 9 turns · 104 in / 4,286 out tokens
With context: $0.0497 · 35s · 8 turns · 82 in / 3,562 out tokens
All redundant criteria identified
100%
100%
Options presented per criterion
100%
100%
Useful criteria preserved
100%
100%
Weight redistribution correct
0%
100%
80% threshold applied
100%
100%
Non-redundant scores unchanged
100%
100%
Below-threshold excluded
100%
100%
Removal option named explicitly
100%
100%
Without context: $0.0705 · 1m 3s · 11 turns · 122 in / 6,441 out tokens
With context: $0.1113 · 1m 34s · 19 turns · 203 in / 8,521 out tokens
Contradicting clause identified
100%
100%
Contradiction mechanism explained
100%
100%
Remove/clarify approach taken
100%
100%
Specific text targeted
100%
100%
No compensating additions
100%
100%
Other sections preserved
100%
100%
Pre-review list intact
100%
100%
Without context: $0.0513 · 36s · 11 turns · 129 in / 3,622 out tokens
With context: $0.0492 · 39s · 11 turns · 155 in / 3,666 out tokens
Explicit retry intervals
100%
100%
Rubric language used
100%
100%
HMAC section unchanged
100%
100%
TLS section unchanged
100%
100%
Observability section unchanged
100%
100%
Processing section unchanged
100%
28%
Retry section only changed
100%
50%
Concise addition
0%
100%
Max retry count preserved
100%
100%
Fast acknowledgement preserved
100%
100%
Without context: $0.0347 · 28s · 7 turns · 81 in / 2,724 out tokens
With context: $0.0711 · 49s · 15 turns · 159 in / 4,431 out tokens