Rules and skills that teach AI agents how to contribute to open source projects without being the villain.
95
91%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
96%
3.55xAverage score across 20 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
I'm triaging an open pull request. The repo's PR template, the open body, and the surrounding context (linked issue + a review thread) are below. Take a look and tell me what you make of it. Do not post anything to GitHub.
Repository: https://github.com/example/queuekeeper
Default branch: trunk
Template path: .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
# Pull request
## Summary
Describe the user-visible change in 2-4 bullets.
## Related issue
Link the issue this resolves.
## Root cause
Explain why the bug happened. If this is not a bug fix, write `N/A`.
## Risk and security impact
Describe security-sensitive or user-visible risk. If none, write `None`.
## Testing
List automated and manual checks.
## Human verification
Describe how a human reviewed the change.
## Checklist
- [ ] I added or updated tests.
- [ ] I reviewed the docs impact.
- [ ] I checked user-visible behavior.# Pull request
Fixes #60900.
This updates the retry worker so stuck jobs are returned to the queue instead of remaining in limbo.
Testing: `npm test`
The root cause, risk analysis, human verification, and checklist status are already described in the linked issue and review thread.The linked issue explains that the worker missed a timeout branch after a scheduler refactor. A review comment says a maintainer manually tested the queue recovery path and found no security impact.