Closing the intent-to-code chasm - specification-driven development with BDD verification chain
94
92%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
95%
1.82xAverage score across 14 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
.feature files or test-specs.md directly — run /iikit-04-testify to regenerate themcontext.json assertion hashes — they are the integrity anchor--no-verify — re-run /iikit-04-testifygit commit --no-verify, git commit -n, or any mechanism to bypass pre-commit hooks.git/hooks/pre-commit, or to .git/hooks/iikit-pre-commit plus a chain-call when your existing hook is preserved.git/hooks/pre-commit.d/ — they run BEFORE IIKit's assertion-integrity check, which validates the post-extension staged state and remains the final gate.git/hooks/pre-commit — use the pre-commit.d/ extension point insteadgit commit-tree, git mktree) to circumvent hook enforcementevals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5
scenario-6
scenario-7
scenario-8
scenario-9
scenario-10
scenario-11
scenario-12
scenario-13
scenario-14
rules
skills
iikit-00-constitution
scripts
dashboard
iikit-01-specify
iikit-02-plan
iikit-03-checklist
scripts
bash
dashboard
iikit-04-testify
iikit-05-tasks
iikit-06-analyze
iikit-07-implement
iikit-08-taskstoissues
iikit-bugfix
scripts
dashboard
iikit-clarify
iikit-core
scripts
bash
dashboard
powershell
templates