Closing the intent-to-code chasm - specification-driven development with BDD verification chain
95
Does it follow best practices?
Validation for skill structure
Content belongs in specific artifacts. Violations indicate content placed in the wrong phase.
Technology-specific content — these belong in /iikit-02-plan:
Auto-fix: Generalize to technology-agnostic statements.
Implementation details — these belong in /iikit-02-plan:
Allowed: Domain concepts (authentication, encryption), user-facing features, data concepts, performance requirements stated as user outcomes.
Auto-fix: Rewrite as user-facing requirements.
Governance content — these belong in /iikit-00-constitution:
Auto-fix: Replace with constitution references.
Scan draft for violations. If found: list each violation, explain which artifact owns that content, auto-fix, re-validate until clean.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i tessl-labs/intent-integrity-kit@2.7.12rules
skills
iikit-00-constitution
scripts
iikit-01-specify
iikit-02-plan
iikit-03-checklist
scripts
dashboard
iikit-04-testify
iikit-05-tasks
iikit-06-analyze
iikit-07-implement
iikit-08-taskstoissues
iikit-bugfix
scripts
dashboard
iikit-clarify
iikit-core
scripts
bash
dashboard
powershell
templates