Optimize your skills and tiles: review SKILL.md quality, generate eval scenarios, run evals, compare across models, diagnose gaps, and re-run until scores improve.
88
94%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
88%
1.07xAverage score across 24 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
{
"context": "Tests whether the agent produces a Phase 7 score comparison in the required format — overall before/after with percentage delta, per-dimension breakdown, and explanation of which dimensions improved and why. Covers the specific score comparison output format prescribed by the skill.",
"type": "weighted_checklist",
"checklist": [
{
"name": "Overall before/after format",
"description": "Report includes the overall score in 'Before: X% | After: Y% (+Z%)' format (or equivalent showing both scores and the delta together in one line or heading)",
"max_score": 12
},
{
"name": "Percentage delta shown",
"description": "Report shows the numeric improvement delta (+31% in this case) alongside or near the before/after scores",
"max_score": 10
},
{
"name": "Per-dimension breakdown",
"description": "Report includes a per-dimension section covering all four dimensions from the review (Completeness, Actionability, Conciseness, Robustness)",
"max_score": 10
},
{
"name": "Arrow notation or equivalent",
"description": "Per-dimension entries show both old and new scores with a directional indicator (e.g. '1/3 → 3/3' or 'was 33%, now 100%')",
"max_score": 8
},
{
"name": "Dimension change labelled",
"description": "Each dimension entry mentions what change caused the score to improve (e.g. 'added Use when clause', 'added executable code examples')",
"max_score": 10
},
{
"name": "Dimensions impact explained",
"description": "Report explains which dimensions improved and why those changes matter — not just numbers",
"max_score": 10
},
{
"name": "Correct overall scores",
"description": "Report accurately states Before: 58%, After: 89%, delta: +31%",
"max_score": 8
},
{
"name": "Completeness improvement noted",
"description": "Report notes Completeness improved from 1/3 (33%) to 3/3 (100%) and attributes it to the Use when clause",
"max_score": 8
},
{
"name": "Actionability improvement noted",
"description": "Report notes Actionability improved from 2/3 (66%) to 3/3 (100%) and attributes it to real executable examples",
"max_score": 8
},
{
"name": "Conciseness unchanged noted",
"description": "Report notes that Conciseness stayed at 2/3 (66%) and did not change between before and after",
"max_score": 8
},
{
"name": "Robustness improvement noted",
"description": "Report notes Robustness improved from 2/3 (66%) to 3/3 (100%)",
"max_score": 8
}
]
}evals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5
scenario-6
scenario-7
scenario-8
scenario-9
scenario-10
scenario-11
scenario-12
scenario-13
scenario-14
scenario-15
scenario-16
scenario-17
scenario-18
scenario-19
scenario-20
scenario-21
scenario-22
scenario-23
scenario-24
skills
compare-skill-model-performance
optimize-skill-instructions
references
optimize-skill-performance
optimize-skill-performance-and-instructions