tessl-labs/tessl-workflow-installer
Implements Tessl skill review GitHub Actions workflows in your repository through an interactive, configuration-first wizard.
Does it follow best practices?
Evaluation — 99%
↑ 1.24xAgent success when using this tile
Validation for skill structure
Activation
100%This is a well-crafted description that excels across all dimensions. It opens with an explicit 'Use when...' clause containing natural trigger terms, lists specific concrete actions, and clearly distinguishes itself through Tessl-specific terminology and the two-workflow architecture distinction. The description is concise yet comprehensive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'setting up automated skill review workflows', 'configuring GitHub Actions', 'adding PR checks', 'implementing CI/CD pipelines', 'migrating between workflow architectures'. Also specifies two distinct repository patterns with security isolation. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Explicitly answers both what (setting up workflows, configuring Actions, adding PR checks, implementing pipelines) and when with a clear 'Use when...' clause at the start. Also clarifies scope with the two repository pattern types. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'GitHub Actions', 'PR checks', 'CI/CD pipelines', 'skill scoring', 'quality gates', 'workflow', 'automated', 'security isolation'. These are terms developers naturally use when discussing these topics. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with specific niche: 'Tessl skill scoring', 'skill review workflows', and the internal vs public repository distinction. Unlikely to conflict with generic CI/CD or GitHub Actions skills due to the Tessl-specific focus. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%This is a well-structured interactive wizard skill with excellent workflow clarity and actionability. The phased approach with explicit confirmation checkpoints is ideal for a setup process. Minor verbosity in explanations and some repeated information prevent a perfect conciseness score, but overall this is a high-quality skill that provides clear, executable guidance.
Suggestions
Trim the architecture explanations in Phase 2 since they're already covered in the Overview section - a brief reminder is sufficient
Remove celebratory language ('Happy skill reviewing! 🎉') and reduce the completion section to just the essential next steps
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is comprehensive but includes some unnecessary verbosity, particularly in the phase descriptions and option explanations. Some sections like the architecture explanations repeat information, and the completion section has celebratory fluff that doesn't add value. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands throughout, specific git operations, exact file paths, and concrete error messages. The template substitution logic and git commands are copy-paste ready with clear variable placeholders. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Excellent multi-step workflow with clear phases (Validation, Configuration, Execution), explicit checkpoints asking for user confirmation at each step, backup creation before updates, and clear decision trees for different scenarios (existing workflow versions, architecture choices). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured with clear overview, phases broken into numbered steps, and appropriate references to external files (single-workflow.md, two-workflow.md, TESTING.md) for detailed templates and testing. The main skill stays focused on the wizard flow while pointing to supporting documentation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i tessl-labs/tessl-workflow-installerReviewed
Table of Contents