A backport of f-string syntax to Python versions < 3.6 using a custom UTF-8 compatible codec
—
Quality
Pending
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
{
"name": "tessl/pypi-future-fstrings",
"version": "1.2.0",
"docs": "docs/index.md",
"describes": "pkg:pypi/future-fstrings@1.2.0",
"summary": "A backport of f-string syntax to Python versions < 3.6 using a custom UTF-8 compatible codec"
}