{
  "context": "This scenario tests the skill's ability to distinguish genuine cross-reference errors from valid legal drafting conventions. The skill must preserve accepted practices such as section-level references and survival clauses while reliably flagging references to non-existent or topically mismatched clauses.",
  "type": "weighted_checklist",
  "checklist": [
    {
      "name": "Valid convention preservation",
      "description": "Does not flag section-level references (e.g., 'clause 5' referring to the whole section 5) as errors",
      "max_score": 30
    },
    {
      "name": "Survival clause handling",
      "description": "Correctly treats survival clauses that reference whole sections by top-level number as valid, without raising false positives",
      "max_score": 20
    },
    {
      "name": "Non-existent clause detection",
      "description": "Flags cross-references to clause numbers that do not appear anywhere in the document's clause map",
      "max_score": 25
    },
    {
      "name": "Topical mismatch detection",
      "description": "Flags cross-references where the referenced clause exists but is clearly unrelated to the surrounding context, and a nearby clause matches perfectly",
      "max_score": 25
    }
  ]
}