Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured procedural skill with a concrete worked example, explicit validation checkpoints, and a properly split one-level reference. Minor trimming of repeated syllabus quotes would tighten it further.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated §4.2.3 inline quotes into a single citation in the References section and paraphrase the procedure steps to reduce token overhead.
Move the full 8-column intermediate table (Step 2) or the syllabus-notation definitions into the reference file, keeping only the collapsed final table in the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean and procedural with a carried worked example, but repeated inline quoting of the §4.2.3 syllabus at each step adds padding that could be trimmed without losing the procedure. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully actionable for an instruction-only skill: exact notation (T/F/-/N/A, X), mechanically filled tables per step, and a copy-paste-ready test-case table with TC IDs, setup, action, and expected result. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–5 are explicitly sequenced with an embedded validation/feedback loop — Step 2 flags columns with '?', Step 4 resolves feasibility, and a constraint check with 'if that check fails, the table must be rebuilt' provides error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body holds the core procedure and signals a single one-level-deep reference for advanced material — 'Extended-entry tables and anti-patterns ... are in references/decision-table-details.md' — and that referenced file exists, keeping navigation shallow and clear. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |