uinaf/viteplus
Migrate or align frontend repositories to the stock VitePlus workflow. Use when standardizing package or monorepo repos around `vp`, `voidzero-dev/setup-vp`, `vite-plus/test`, and VitePlus-native CI, test, and packaging flows, including updating scripts, test config, CI setup, and packaging commands.
94
94%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
95%
2.63xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong, well-crafted skill description that clearly defines a narrow domain (VitePlus workflow migration), lists concrete actions, and provides explicit trigger guidance with a 'Use when' clause. The inclusion of specific tool names and package references makes it highly distinctive and easy for Claude to match against relevant user requests.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: migrating/aligning frontend repos, standardizing around specific tools, updating scripts, test config, CI setup, and packaging commands. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (migrate/align frontend repos to VitePlus workflow) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when standardizing package or monorepo repos around specific tools and flows'), with detailed trigger conditions. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes highly specific natural keywords users would say: 'VitePlus', 'vp', 'voidzero-dev/setup-vp', 'vite-plus/test', 'CI', 'monorepo', 'packaging flows', 'test config'. These are precise terms a developer working in this ecosystem would naturally use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with a very specific niche: VitePlus workflow migration with named tools like `vp`, `voidzero-dev/setup-vp`, and `vite-plus/test`. Extremely unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured migration skill with clear workflow sequencing, concrete code examples (YAML, TypeScript, diff), and excellent progressive disclosure through contextually placed references. The content is mostly concise but could trim a few explanatory phrases in the guardrails section. Overall it provides strong, actionable guidance for the migration task.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Generally efficient but has some verbosity in the guardrails section (e.g., explaining when to treat coverage warnings as caveats) and the workflow steps could be tighter. Some phrasing like 'without blindly deleting repo-specific release or runtime logic' is slightly padded. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete YAML CI snippets, TypeScript config examples, and a diff showing before/after migration of package.json scripts. The commands (`vp env`, `vp install`, `vp check`, `vp test`, `vp pack`, `vp build`) are specific and copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 9-step workflow is clearly sequenced with logical ordering (audit → read bootstrap → choose shape → update tools → CI → tests → commands → preserve specifics → validate). Step 9 provides explicit validation, and step 8 acts as a guardrail checkpoint. The feedback loop of validate-then-recheck is present. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent progressive disclosure with a clear overview workflow in the main file and well-signaled one-level-deep references to specific topics: bootstrap.md, packages.md, monorepos.md, ci-cd.md, testing.md, and commands.md. Each reference is contextually placed at the relevant workflow step. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents