CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
PluginPublic

adobe/aem-6-5-lts

All AEM 6.5 LTS skills: Workflow model design, development, triggering, launchers, debugging, and triaging; Dispatcher config authoring, advisory, incident response, performance tuning, and security hardening; Replication agent configuration, content activation, API usage, and troubleshooting for AEM 6.5 LTS and AMS environments; Jackrabbit Oak query/index tuning (property, Lucene index definitions); and extracting/inventorying JCR queries (XPath, SQL2, QueryBuilder) across a codebase.

Quality

79%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

core-7-tools-reference.mdskills/dispatcher/technical-advisory/references/dispatcher-foundation/

Core-7 Tools Reference

This document defines the shared MCP tool contract used by the dispatcher skills.

Overview

The core-7-tools contract is the baseline tool set for dispatcher work across both AEMaaCS and AMS variants.

The contract exists to keep dispatcher skills:

  • deterministic
  • auditable
  • variant-aware
  • constrained to a stable, reviewable execution surface

Tool Catalog

validate

Purpose:

  • syntax and structure validation for dispatcher and HTTPD config fragments

Use when:

  • authoring or reviewing .any, vhost, rewrite, cache, or filter changes
  • checking config before runtime verification

Common patterns:

  • dispatcher section validation
  • HTTPD/vhost block validation
  • variant-specific validation modes such as ams or cloud

lint

Purpose:

  • best-practice analysis across security, performance, ordering, and maintainability concerns

Use when:

  • filter order matters
  • release gates or security gates are required
  • config quality matters beyond raw syntax validity

Common patterns:

  • lint(strict) for release or security gates
  • lint(deep) for filter, cache, and ordering-heavy changes

sdk

Purpose:

  • file-level integrity checks, baseline drift analysis, and SDK-backed validation helpers

Use when:

  • include topology matters
  • immutable/default drift matters
  • local project or validator-backed evidence is needed

Common patterns:

  • sdk(check-files)
  • sdk(diff-baseline)
  • optional deeper validation helpers when the environment supports them

trace_request

Purpose:

  • trace effective routing and decision flow for a representative request

Use when:

  • debugging 403, 5xx, redirect loops, host routing, or rewrite behavior
  • proving expected allow or deny outcomes

Common patterns:

  • failing URL versus healthy URL comparison
  • canonical redirect checks
  • host and method-sensitive routing checks

inspect_cache

Purpose:

  • inspect cacheability, cache state, and metadata for representative URLs

Use when:

  • tuning cache rules
  • debugging cache misses, stale content, or invalidation scope
  • checking auth-sensitive cache behavior

monitor_metrics

Purpose:

  • capture operational signals such as status-code mix, latency shifts, or hit-ratio changes

Use when:

  • triaging incidents
  • comparing before/after tuning evidence
  • quantifying impact windows

tail_logs

Purpose:

  • collect concrete runtime evidence from dispatcher or HTTPD logs

Use when:

  • an incident needs real examples instead of only static reasoning
  • cache or redirect behavior needs corroboration
  • a request trace needs supporting log evidence

Contract Rules

All dispatcher skills that declare mcp-tool-contract: core-7-tools should follow these rules:

  1. Prefer the smallest sufficient command chain.
  2. Do not claim a tool was run unless evidence exists.
  3. Distinguish observation from inference.
  4. Use static checks first unless the task is runtime-first by nature.
  5. Keep variant assumptions explicit (ams vs cloud).
  6. Report skipped checks and why they were skipped.

Selection Guidance

Use this progression unless a specialist playbook says otherwise:

  1. validate
  2. lint
  3. sdk
  4. trace_request
  5. inspect_cache
  6. tail_logs
  7. monitor_metrics

Not every task needs all seven tools. The contract defines the allowed baseline, not a mandatory full run.

Failure And Troubleshooting Patterns

When a tool fails or cannot be used:

  • validate failure:
    • report the exact failing block and error text
    • do not continue as if the config is structurally sound
  • lint failure or warning set:
    • separate hard blockers from advisory findings
    • keep ordering and security warnings explicit
  • sdk(check-files) failure:
    • treat include topology, immutable-file drift, or missing-file issues as high-signal structural problems
  • trace_request unavailable:
    • fall back to static rule analysis and state the confidence limit clearly
  • inspect_cache unavailable:
    • use static cache reasoning plus any available log or metric signals
  • tail_logs unavailable:
    • avoid claiming runtime confirmation
  • monitor_metrics unavailable:
    • avoid quantifying impact improvements or regressions

Variant Notes

  • The tool contract is shared across variants.
  • The meaning of success differs by variant because guardrails differ.
  • Always pair the tool outputs with the relevant variant guardrails and verification matrix.

skills

dispatcher

README.md

SKILL.md

README.md

tile.json