CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
PluginPublic

ai-unified-process/aiup-core

AI Unified Process core - stack-agnostic requirements, entity model, and use cases, plus the construction orchestrators for layer plugins

Quality

95%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

SKILL.mdskills/test-case-coverage/

name:
test-case-coverage
description:
Audits an already-automated test case (TC-XXX) — one end-to-end journey across several use cases — against its document and reports a coverage matrix: which Flow rows, Validation items, and postconditions have a test step and code behind them, which are still open, and which test steps have drifted away from the test case. Use when the user asks to "check coverage of TC-001", "is TC-001 completely automated", "audit the journey", "show me the coverage matrix for the test case", "what is still missing for TC-001", or "can I set TC-001 to Automated". This is specification coverage, not line coverage. It reports only — it writes no code, no tests, and no files. For projects that combine layer plugins and record them in docs/architecture/stack.md; aiup-vaadin-jooq and aiup-angular-jpa bring their own /coverage-check TC-XXX. A use case (UC-XXX) is /use-case-coverage. When the user wants the gaps closed rather than listed, use /test-case-implement or /use-case-implement instead.

Coverage Check (test case)

Instructions

Audit the test case $ARGUMENTS against the journey test and the code that are supposed to realize it, and report the result.

This skill is a front door to the read-only uc-coverage-layered sub-agent of aiup-core, the same agent /use-case-coverage uses. The audit checklist lives in agents/uc-coverage-layered.md at the plugin root (locate it with a glob for **/agents/uc-coverage-layered.md) and is deliberately not repeated here. How a report is presented, compared with an earlier run, and run on a host without sub-agents is owned by /use-case-coverage: locate it with a glob for **/*use-case-coverage/SKILL.md (the folder may carry a host prefix such as tessl__use-case-coverage) and apply its sections "Delegation", "Repeated Runs", and "Hosts without sub-agents" as written. Your job is argument parsing, delegation, faithful presentation, and offering the next step.

The report is the deliverable. You do not fix what it finds.

Arguments

Everything is parsed out of $ARGUMENTS; the tokens may appear in any order.

TokenMeaning
TC-001, TC001, tc 1, or a path to a test casethe journey to audit — normalize to TC-001
implementation, impl, codemode implementation
tests, testmode tests
both, or no mode token at allmode both (the default)
wip, --wip, work in progress, in progress, draftpass the work-in-progress qualifier through
a UC-* idnot a journey — hand off to /use-case-coverage UC-XXX
nothinglist the test cases and ask — see below

A mode is only narrowed by a standalone qualifier token, never by a word in a sentence. State the resolved arguments in one line before delegating (Auditing TC-001, mode both.).

Workflow

  1. Parse $ARGUMENTS into the id, the mode, and the work-in-progress flag.

  2. Confirm the test case exists — docs/test_cases/TC-XXX-*.md. Stop, list the near matches, and ask if it does not. Never audit against a journey you inferred from the tests.

  3. State the resolved arguments in one line.

  4. Delegate the audit to uc-coverage-layered (it may appear as aiup-core:uc-coverage-layered), passing exactly the id, the mode, and — when it applies — work in progress, nothing else:

    TC-001 both
    TC-001 tests work in progress
  5. Present the returned report unchanged, and on a rerun add the comparison — the sections of /use-case-coverage named in Instructions.

  6. Offer the gap-closing commands — see After the Report. Then stop.

With no id: if the conversation has just been working on a specific TC-*, propose that one and ask. Otherwise list docs/test_cases/ with each test case's **Status:** line and ask which to audit. Audit one journey per run.

After the Report

  • A test gap — a Flow row or Validation item without a test step — closes with /test-case-implement TC-XXX.
  • An implementation gap sits in a use case the journey chains: name the use case of that Flow row and offer /use-case-implement UC-YYY, narrowed to a layer when the report names one.
  • Missing Markers rows of the E2E layer close with a rerun of the E2E test skill named in the Layers table; docs/architecture/stack.md itself missing closes with /stack.
  • Drift is not a gap with a known fix. For each drift item, ask the user which side is right — the test case (/test-case TC-XXX updates the journey) or the application (/use-case-implement UC-YYY) — and offer only the command that matches the answer. Never pick a side yourself.
  • Offer the commands; run one only if the user says yes. Pass an Automated suggestion on as a suggestion: it says the journey is automated, not that it passes, and the agent cannot run it — never claim it was run. Do not edit the test case's **Status:** line.

DO NOT

  • Do not write or edit code, tests, or specifications — including the **Status:** line.
  • Do not restate or paraphrase the agent's audit checklist in this file; agents/uc-coverage-layered.md owns it.
  • Do not soften, upgrade, or drop a verdict, and do not present a summary in place of the matrix.
  • Do not tell the agent what you expect it to find.
  • Do not claim that a build or a test suite was run.

skills

test-case-coverage

README.md

tile.json