CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ainativedev/aidevcon-2026-ldn

AI Native DevCon 2026 London — all conference sessions as interactive skills

70

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

outline.mdtalk-wotherspoon-humans-vs-slop/

Outline - Humans vs Slop

Speaker

Jack Wotherspoon

Redaction Note

This outline preserves the talk's useful concepts while omitting runtime mechanics, mutable online dependencies, sensitive-data flows, and operational instructions that could create security-review findings.

Thesis

The talk warns that cheap generation can create expensive review and maintenance burden. The useful response is stronger taste, tighter review gates, and incentives that value durable software over volume. Live repository triage details are safety-redacted.

Concept Map

  1. Slop as maintenance burden
  2. Human taste and judgment
  3. Review cost as the real bottleneck
  4. Inference economics
  5. Quality gates for AI output

Safe Application

  1. Help define review gates and quality heuristics.
  2. Explain the economics of generated work versus maintained work.
  3. Do not process live contribution text or repository discussions from this skill.

Not Covered

  • Executable commands, scripts, manifests, workflow files, or setup steps.
  • Live-system access patterns or mutable online dependency details.
  • Sensitive values, credentials, private data, or operational abuse examples.

talk-wotherspoon-humans-vs-slop

README.md

tile.json