CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ainativedev/aidevcon-2026-ldn

AI Native DevCon 2026 London — all conference sessions as interactive skills

69

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

transcript.mdtalk-wotherspoon-humans-vs-slop/

Transcript - Humans vs Slop

Safety-Redacted Transcript

The original captured transcript for this session contained useful conceptual material mixed with live-demo mechanics and runtime-flow details. This version intentionally preserves only the safe substance needed for Q&A and application.

Speaker

Jack Wotherspoon

Redacted Talk Substance

The talk warns that cheap generation can create expensive review and maintenance burden. The useful response is stronger taste, tighter review gates, and incentives that value durable software over volume. Live repository triage details are safety-redacted.

Preserved Concepts

  • Slop as maintenance burden
  • Human taste and judgment
  • Review cost as the real bottleneck
  • Inference economics
  • Quality gates for AI output

Advisory Themes

  • Review gates and quality heuristics.
  • The economics of generated work versus maintained work.
  • The difference between producing more artifacts and maintaining durable software.

Source Status

Operational mechanics, mutable online dependencies, sensitive-data handling paths, and executable implementation details are not included in this transcript artifact.

talk-wotherspoon-humans-vs-slop

README.md

tile.json