Agent kit for working on canonical/chisel-releases. Cross-agent skills + scripts for authoring and reviewing chisel slice definition files.
81
85%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
75%
Average score across 5 eval scenarios
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Include every dependency package added or changed in verification. Keep check status separate from finding severity.
Network access is required. Report network failures and access refusals as unavailable; do not work around them with offline fallbacks, cached upstream substitutes or test-specific behaviour. Do not turn an observed product failure into an unavailable check. Inspect diagnostics when a cut or spread command fails: non-zero exit alone does not distinguish a defect from an inaccessible service.
Stop the affected work when the checkout or target is unknown, maintenance cannot be established for a write, required package contents or dependency providers cannot be inspected, or a required dependency cycle remains unresolved. Do not invent missing evidence. Independent checks may still proceed.
Missing runtime tools/backends or unreachable documentation can leave checks pending after the files are written and statically checked. They never excuse omitting tests. Incomplete release discovery leaves forward-port coverage unverified; it does not establish that a release is EOL or that no ports remain.
For each applicable check, record passed/failed/unavailable, evidence, release and architecture where relevant. Include justified warnings, representative coverage choices, verification gaps and remaining forward ports. Existing CI results count only when they cover the reviewed revision and relevant scope; future CI is not evidence of success.