OpenTelemetry Collector deployment, instrumentation (Java/Python/Node.js/.NET/Go), and OTTL pipeline transforms for Coralogix — coralogix exporter config, Helm chart selection, Kubernetes topology, ECS/EKS/GKE deployments, SDK setup, APM transactions, and OTTL cardinality/PII/routing.
92
96%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
92%
1.10xAverage score across 127 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
{
"context": "Evaluating a Coralogix support response for this user question:\n\nMy Node.js service injects a traceparent header into outgoing HTTP requests, but when the request reaches our .NET Framework backend I see independent spans in Coralogix instead of child spans — the trace is broken at the service boundary. What's wrong?",
"type": "weighted_checklist",
"checklist": [
{
"name": "mentions-propagat",
"description": "The response contains \"propagat\" (case-insensitive).",
"max_score": 3
},
{
"name": "mentions-w3c",
"description": "The response contains \"W3C\" (case-insensitive).",
"max_score": 3
},
{
"name": "mentions-addaspnetinstrumentation",
"description": "The response contains \"AddAspNetInstrumentation\" (case-insensitive).",
"max_score": 3
},
{
"name": "no-if-it-identifies-the-node-js-injection-as",
"description": "Explains that .NET Framework does not extract incoming W3C traceparent headers automatically and requires server-side instrumentation: OpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.AspNet must be installed and AddAspNetInstrumentation() called on the TracerProvider so the server reads and continues the incoming trace context. Must NOT suggest AddHttpClientInstrumentation — that only instruments outgoing HttpClient calls and does nothing for incoming request propagation. Should also recommend confirming the upstream Node.js service sends W3C format headers (not B3/Zipkin) and that no intermediaries strip the traceparent header. FAIL if it identifies the Node.js injection as the problem, if it does not mention AddAspNetInstrumentation (or AddAspNetCoreInstrumentation for .NET Core), or if it recommends AddHttpClientInstrumentation as the fix.",
"max_score": 2
}
]
}.claude-plugin
.codex-plugin
.cursor-plugin
evals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5
scenario-6
scenario-7
scenario-8
scenario-9
scenario-10
scenario-11
scenario-12
scenario-13
scenario-14
scenario-15
scenario-16
scenario-17
scenario-18
scenario-19
scenario-20
scenario-21
scenario-22
scenario-23
scenario-24
scenario-25
scenario-26
scenario-27
scenario-28
scenario-29
scenario-30
scenario-31
scenario-32
scenario-33
scenario-34
scenario-35
scenario-36
scenario-37
scenario-38
scenario-39
scenario-40
scenario-41
scenario-42
scenario-43
scenario-44
scenario-45
scenario-46
scenario-47
scenario-48
scenario-49
scenario-50
scenario-51
scenario-52
scenario-53
scenario-54
scenario-55
scenario-56
scenario-57
scenario-58
scenario-59
scenario-60
scenario-61
scenario-62
scenario-63
scenario-64
scenario-65
scenario-66
scenario-67
scenario-68
scenario-69
scenario-70
scenario-71
scenario-72
scenario-73
scenario-74
scenario-75
scenario-76
scenario-77
scenario-78
scenario-79
scenario-80
scenario-81
scenario-82
scenario-83
scenario-84
scenario-85
scenario-86
scenario-87
scenario-88
scenario-89
scenario-90
scenario-91
scenario-92
scenario-93
scenario-94
scenario-95
scenario-96
scenario-97
scenario-98
scenario-99
scenario-100
scenario-101
scenario-102
scenario-103
scenario-104
scenario-105
scenario-106
scenario-107
scenario-108
scenario-109
scenario-110
scenario-111
scenario-112
scenario-113
scenario-114
scenario-115
scenario-116
scenario-117
scenario-118
scenario-119
scenario-120
scenario-121
scenario-122
scenario-123
scenario-124
scenario-125
scenario-126
scenario-127
skills
opentelemetry
opentelemetry-collector
references
opentelemetry-instrumentation
opentelemetry-ottl